Most definitely. He was a far superior hitter to B. Robinson, and that is more valuable than defense. On the other side, he was a great glove with good range.
Santo suffers from playing for the Cubs and an unfair comparison to Brooks Robinson.

Comments

  1. James says:

    no

  2. Mic Y says:

    Absolutely, and I am not a Ron Santo fan. The Hall of Fame is stacked with power-hitting position players, but there is a great deal more to the game than that. Santo was always a dangerous opponent, whether at bat or in the field, and probably never got the recognition he deserved, even as a player.
    I feel that the Hall of Fame needs to be a bit more open, which is diametrically opposed to the philosophy of both the writers and the Veterans’ Committee.

  3. desotobr says:

    Yes he was an awesome player he definitely belongs in the Hall of Fame

  4. brewers_ says:

    Maybe the beer drinking hall of fame. Cubs fans love him, the rest of the world doesn’t care.

  5. Bill S says:

    yes

  6. Dave W says:

    Not really…after all Brooks Robinson hit 268HR’s in 23 years, Ron Santo only hit 362HR’s in 15 years….Robinson hit .267, Santo only hit .277….Robinson 2848 hits – Santo 2254….OB% Robinson .322 – Santo .362….SGL Robinson .401 – Santo .464…Robinson did have a better fielding % .971 to Santo .954….But Santo had better range as hard as that is to believe….in 23 years Robinson had 500+TC 7 times….Santo did it 8 years in a row….
    Yes Ron Santo probable belongs in the HOF….But you have to remember Brooks won the AL MVP in 1964 and he put on one hell of a show against the Reds in the WS…

  7. jack says:

    Yes, for sure. He was a great player and has done a lot for baseball, being a broadcaster for several years.

  8. Nightfly says:

    Of course, along with the entire Cubs infield from 1969. Santo, Kessinger, Beckert and Banks.

  9. Chase says:

    I think he should be in the Hall of Fame along with Brooks Robinson, but Brooks seemed to have an overall better career…although Ron Santo may have a accomplished a lot in fewer years that Brooks…it doesn’t necessarily mean that he was a better player. I heard that Brooks is playing in the legends sports challenge? Anyway, Ron Santo does deserve to be in the Hall of Fame.